The first-time resolution rate has a decisive impact on customer satisfaction. Any form of willingness on the part of the customer to recommend them depends on not provoking service contacts in the first place or, if unavoidable, ending them in the first contact.
To achieve these goals, various methods are used in customer service. In the following, we will try to get to the root of the challenge of avoiding contact.
1. Basics of contact avoidance
Sensible approaches to contact avoidance are based on the systematic use of contact data mining. In order to determine contact rates according to contact reasons, contacts must be documented in the necessary granularity in the existing agent front ends and CRM systems.
In practice, at least three contact classes are shown in the evaluations:
a) Contact rate/reason around one (1): Frequently contact reason „Change of customer data“
b) Contact rate/reason around two (2): Often „I want to become a customer“ or „Termination“
c) Contact rate/reason greater than two (2): Often customer reasons (reminder, reminder, deferral/installment payment and collection).
The measures for avoiding contact are often based on these classes.
2. Contact Class Methods (a)
The contacts of this class are often shifted to customer self-service or chat-bot processing. Therefore, there is no avoidance of contact, but the focus is on reducing costs.
3. Contact Class Methods (b and c)
For the contact rates around the two (2), the approach should be to avoid the third (3) contact at all costs. In essence, this means avoiding the second contact at all costs. Why is that?
Second contacts for the same reason for contact often arise because the solution requires a certain level of security in processing. This „security“ is often not yet available for new employees. The reality: With fluctuation rates of 30% p.a., the probability that my more complex issue will not be solved in the first contact is at least 10%. If the resulting second contact ends up with a new employee, the path to the third contact is not far away. By the way: The willingness of these affected customers to recommend drops to less than 50%.
The method to reliably avoid the second and third contact lies in the organization of the routing in the multi-channel system or the PBX. The organization of the „skills“ should correspond to the level of the skills of the agents, e.g.:
Basically, before the actual routing begins, the following must be determined:
The above information must be requested in a language portal (or classic IVR). Simplifications are possible if:
To derive the number of contacts that have already taken place, reference must be made to the customer history in the agent frontend or CRM system. In order not to burden the systems with the real-time load of requests, a special database can be used. The database is supplied with the necessary information on a daily basis:
This information was used to determine the optimal routing destination for each customer request, depending on the previous contact(s) and/or a communication measure. You will learn what a suitable skill structure looks like in a second part of one of the following TTW.
Hans-Joachim Grün – Senior Consultant
junokai